Parliamentary Oversight and its Role in Ensuring Constitutionalism and Accountability under the FDRE Constitution
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2011-11
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Addis Ababa University
Abstract
Parliamentary oversight is neglected area af research in many jurisdictions and there is very
limited discussion on the area. The situation in Ethiapia is not exception in this regard and it is
totally neglected. Democratic government is characterized by transparency and accountability.
The primary responsibility in this regard falls on the shaulder of the parliament. The parliament
has the pawer and the mandate to oversight the executives to ensure their policy and action
commensurate with the need of society. By the advent of modern parliaments, the legislative
preragative was the basic right to scrutinize government actions. The legislature, often
conceived as the forum of the notion, acts as custodian of the electorate's trust. As such, it is
tasked with ensuring executive accountability through a rigorous parliamentary process that
invariably assesses the performance of Cabinet Ministers and their departments . However,
nowadays; the lawmakers do not seem to attach the same impartance to this activity seeing it
as a secondary functian. In this thesis the focus is assessing whether parliamentary aversight in
Ethiapia (at the federal level) is effective in ensuring constitutionalism and accountability. To
this end, the issue of the possible taols of parliamentary oversight that available to the House of
Peoples Representative and the factars affecting parliamentary oversight in Ethiopia also to be
dealt. The FORE constitution empowers the House of Peoples Representative to call and
question any government offiCials including the PM and may take any measures it deems
necessary. Likewise, proclamation No.470/2005 and Regulatian No.3/2006 also empowers the
HPR to oversee the executive's overall actions and activities. Thus, this research aims at
examining whether the existing Ethiopian parliament is effective in discharging its constitutional
mandate of overseeing the executive and to what extent oversight ensures constitutionalism
and accountability. The study examines the tools that the House uses in conducting oversighr
and most importantly factors affecting parliamentary oversight. The study will be conducted by
analyzing pertinent laws and with theoreticol and practical analysis. Accordingly, the writer
argues that the existing Ethiopian parliament is ineffective in conducting effective parliamentary
oversight. Thus, objective of oversight which the regulation provides, ensuring constitutionalism,
rule of law and accountability among other things remain in question. At the federal level, (in
Ethiopia in general) there are different factors hindering the parliament's oversight function.
Among this factor most importantly the party system (one party domination), lack of
understanding of the signlficonce of oversight by the MP, inadequate resources like financial
constraint, experts and lack of commitment and the status of legislative- executive relation are
among the challenges of parliamentary oversight.
Description
Keywords
Law