Determination of Iron Fractions of Laboratory and Field Threshed Teff Flour, Fermented Dough and Injera: Implications to Iron Bioavailability

dc.contributor.advisorAbuye, Cherinet (PhD)
dc.contributor.advisorBaye, Kaleab (PhD)
dc.contributor.authorAmbaw, Ashenafi
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T08:20:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-09T15:32:33Z
dc.date.available2021-01-25T08:20:17Z
dc.date.available2023-11-09T15:32:33Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-06
dc.description.abstractBackground-Iron deficiency is prevalent in Ethiopia despite high dietary iron intake. The contribution of iron from extrinsic sources from soil contamination during threshing is likely to be high. However, the extent of contamination and bioavailability of the contaminant iron remains unknown. Objective-To evaluate whether there is difference in iron fractions of field and laboratories threshed teff and investigate how fermentation affects the mobility of the different iron fractions and mineral absorption inhibitors. Methods-Teff variety grown under the same conditions but threshed differently (Laboratory and field threshed) was collected and characterized for their proximate composition and mineral absorption inhibitors. Total iron analysis and iron fractionation into five fractions using sequential extraction scheme were performed. The effect of fermentation and baking on the mobility of iron fractions was also evaluated. Results-Field threshed teff had ~37% more iron content than that of laboratory threshed teff. Threshing significantly contributed to the exchangeable, reducible and residual fractions. Fermentation plays a great role in mobilizing iron fractions of both laboratory and field threshed teff. In both lab and field threshed teff samples, fermentation significantly increased the exchangeable and decreased the residual fraction. Furthermore, fermentation lead to significant decreases in phytate, iron-binding polyphenols and tannin (P<0.05.) in both laboratory and field threshed teff-injera. No significant differences in proximate composition between lab and field threshed teff, except for higher ash content in the field threshed teff, was observed. Conclusion- Contaminant iron, mainly due to threshing, adds up to the total iron content of field threshed teff. Fermentation degraded mineral absorption inhibitors and mobilized iron fractions into more mobile and bioavailable fraction i.e. exchangeable fraction. Contaminant iron is likely to contribute to the intake of bioavailable iron.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.90.10.223:4000/handle/123456789/24812
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAddis Ababa Universityen_US
dc.subjectSequential Extractionen_US
dc.subjectThreshingen_US
dc.subjectFermentationen_US
dc.subjectSoilen_US
dc.subjectContaminationen_US
dc.subjectFractionationen_US
dc.subjectBioavailabilityen_US
dc.titleDetermination of Iron Fractions of Laboratory and Field Threshed Teff Flour, Fermented Dough and Injera: Implications to Iron Bioavailabilityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Ashenafi Ambaw 2013.pdf
Size:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: