Handwriting: A Comparative Study of the Synthetic And Global Methods
No Thumbnail Available
Date
1989-06
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Addis Ababa University
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to find out
whether or not the Global Me t hod is more effective than the
Synthetic ' Iethod in the t eaching of handwriting. To achi eve this , an experiment , for which hundred
subjects were selected, was conducted for six weeks. Out
of the hundred subjects , ninety- five children in four groups
attended the experiment. Two of the groups formed the
Control groups and the other two , the Study groups.
A pretest was given to both the Control and Study
groups to det ermine if they had a significant difference
in writing performance. Statistical computations, however,
showed tha t there was no significant difference
between the t wo groups in writing cursively.
After six weeks, a post-test was administered to both
the Control and Study groups. A t - t est at 0.5 l evel of
confidence was conducted to determine the significance
difference between the means of the two groups and the
results showed that the Study groups performed better
than the Control groups. A conclusion was drawn that the
Global Method is more effective than the Synthetic
Method in the teaching of handwriting.
On the basis of the findings , it is recommended that
children in the elementary schools be taught handwriting
through the Global Method and tha t speed of writing be
considered and increased without affecting handwriting
l egibility adversely affected
Description
Keywords
Synthetic, And Global Methods