Specimen rejection rate and associated factors among referred specimens through referral network to Debre Markos referral hospital for Laboratory testing, Debre Markos, Ethiopia

dc.contributor.advisorHassen, Fatuma (BA, BSc, MPH, PhD candidate)
dc.contributor.advisorMolla, Habtamu(BSc, Msc, PhD candidate)
dc.contributor.authorMesganaw, Bewket
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-16T12:15:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-06T08:56:46Z
dc.date.available2020-11-16T12:15:10Z
dc.date.available2023-11-06T08:56:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinical laboratory errors could be classified as pre analytical, analytical and post analytical. The majority of laboratory errors emerge from the manually intensive activities of the pre analytical phase, mainly those related to collection, handling, transportation, preparation and storage of diagnostic specimens. Objective: The main aim of this study was to assess the specimen rejection rate and associated factors among the referred specimens through referral network to Debre Markos referral hospital for laboratory testing. Method: Retrospective study was conducted at Debre Markos referral hospital laboratory from January 2016 to December 2019 to evaluate trends of specimen rejection rate. In addition, prospective cross sectional study design was applied from January 2020 to April 2020 to investigate further associated factors of specimen rejection. Data was collected from specimen reception log book and from referring facilities using developed checklist. Finally, statistical analysis was done with excel 2007 and SPSS version 20.0 software. Result: From the total of 35673 specimens submitted to Debre Markos referral hospital laboratory from January 2016 to December 2019, a total of 560 (1.57%) specimens were rejected. The specimen rejection rates in each year were 2.30%, 1.59%, 1.42% and 1.26 % respectively from 2016 to 2019. Moreover, of 2750 specimens submitted to the laboratory during January 2020 to April 2020, a total of 37 (1.34%) specimens were rejected. Specimen collector training status and experience had significant association with specimen rejection rate (P= 0.01& P=0.04 respectively). Conclusion: Although specimen rejection rate among referred specimens was improved gradually from 2016 to 2019, still needs more interventions to meet the established target specimen rejection rate (0.3%).Hence, training of health professionals on specimen collection, handling and transportation of requested tests, appropriate preventive and corrective actions could improve the problem in specimen referral network.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/23318
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAddis Abeba Universityen_US
dc.subjectSpecimen rejection rate, clinical laboratory errors, laboratory quality management systemen_US
dc.titleSpecimen rejection rate and associated factors among referred specimens through referral network to Debre Markos referral hospital for Laboratory testing, Debre Markos, Ethiopiaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Bewket Mesganaw.pdf
Size:
420.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: