Problem of Causativization in Amharic

No Thumbnail Available

Date

1997-12

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Addis Ababa University

Abstract

The presence of an agent in the interpretation of 'astem' forms and its absence 1n the basic stems define the function of 'a-' as agentive or causative aff~x in Amharic. The formal analysis is also plain that 'a-' atcaches to nonagentive basic stems. The common interpretation of 'as-stem' forms show double (that is, ultimate and immediate) agency in relation to the resulting event whether the stems have agent or not in their argument structure. This phenomenon has been frequently stated in the literature as indirect causative (Bender and Hailu, 1978), (Appleyard,1972) causative of the passive (Leslau, 1967) and factitive (Bender and Hailu, 1978) function of the affix 'as-' . This paper verifies the observed passive representation of the base of 'as-stem' causatives in terms of Prominence Theory of Argument Structure (Grimshaw, 1990). According to this theory, an external argument cannot be introduced to an a-structure in which there is one. Hence, passivization of agenti ve verbs is necessary in order to suppress the agent (external argument), that is, to give way for the integration of arguments in causativization . Accordingly, the so - called 'as-stem' causatives have been derivationally related to the basic stems by analysing the causative form into 'a-s-stem', representing passivization and causativization as separate affixational processes. By providing morphophonological explanations that relate [sl to the passive morpheme /t-/ this approach offers a unified account of causativization in Amharic .

Description

Keywords

Problem of Causativization

Citation

Collections