Effects of Feeding Urea-Molasses, Urea-Lime and Effective Micro-organism Treated Wheat Straw Basal Diets on Feed Intake and Growth Performance of Weaned Friesian-Borana Female Calves at Holetta Research Center, Ethiopia
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Addis Ababa University
Abstract
The study was carried out at Holetta Agricultural Research Center to evaluate the effects of urea-molasses, urea-lime and effective micro-organisms treatments on wheat straw quality parameters, and feed intake and apparent digestibility, growth performance and total feed cost of crossbred calves (3/4 Friesian X Borana). A completely randomized design was used for the laboratory trial. The randomized complete block design was employed to conduct the feeding and digestibility trial for over a total period of 104 experimental days. The dietary treatments were: - untreated wheat straw (T1), wheat straw treated with urea-molasses (T2), Urea-lime (T3) and activated effective micro-organism (T4). The result from the laboratory trial indicated that treatment options affected (P<0.05) the proximate, detergent and in vitro digestibility fractions with the highest crude protein (CP%) content being recorded for (T2 = 6.31%) followed by (T3 =4.88%). The values of NDF and ADF were reduced by effective microbial and urea-molasses treatment options. The highest (P<0.001) daily DM intake were recorded for calves that were receiving dietary T3 (3.7 kg/head) and T4 (3.5 kg/head) than those receiving T2 (3.1 kg/head) and the control diet T1 (3.02 kg/head). Apparent dry matter and nutrient digestibility of the experimental calves fed treated straw were found to be highest (P<0.01) when compared to calves that were maintained on the control diet. Average daily gain of calves was significantly highest (p<0.001) for calves in T3 (422.7 g/d) and T4 (391 g/d) groups than those in T2 (281.7 g/d) and T1 (204.3 g/d) groups. Feed conversion ratios was observed to be higher (P<0.01) for calves in T3 (8.8 g feed/ each g gained) and T4 (9.4 g feed /each g gained) groups than those on the control diets (15.1 g feed /each g gained). The total feed cost of calves maintained on the treated straw-based diets was significantly (p<0.001) higher than those on the control diet. The ratio of total feed cost to the live weight gain of calves were significant (P<0.05) higher for T1 (110.8 birr/each kg gained) and T2 (109.6 birr/each kg gained) as compared to T4 (82.5 birr/each kg gained) and T3 (76.7 birr/each kg gained). Hence, it could be concluded that treating wheat straw using urea-molasses, urea-lime and EM could improve its nutritional values, improve growth performance cost-effectively when fed to crossbreed calves with concentrate supplemented at the rate of 1.2% of the calves’ fortnightly weight changes. However, to draw valid conclusion further research needs to conduct to identify the optimum level of lime in the urea-lime combinations used for the crop residues treatment.
Description
Keywords
Crossbred calves, straw treatment, feed intake, apparent digestibility, Wheat straw, live weight