Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court on Child Soldiers: Promoting Impunity
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2014-04
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Addis Ababa University
Abstract
This thesis investigates the issues of jurisdiction of the ICC on child soldiers with respect to war
crimes potentially or actually committed by children between the age of fifteen and eighteen
during armed conflicts. It examines the legal frameworks governing child soldiers particularly
the ICC Rome Statute and see if there exists impunity under the ICC regime. After a thorough
examination on the images of child soldiers in different international human rights instruments, a
cross reference is drawn to the ICC Rome Statute on its implication of exclusion of jurisdiction
to child soldiers or jurisdictional limitation.
The definition of children as every person below eighteen years of age, in most of the
international human rights instruments, is creating a misleading concept on the issues of criminal
culpability for criminal accountability for serious violations of human rights. Most, if not all
international human rights instruments imagined children as innocent victims needing only legal
and humanitarian protection. However, this imagination is implausible to all sorts of children
because children can be classified as infants, young and adolescents where the criminal
culpability hugely so differs.
Hence, a mechanism must be figured out for those persons between the age of fifteen and
eighteen for their criminal accountability in the ICC Rome Statute for serious human rights
violations during armed conflicts. This is because children in this age group are allowed to
participate in armed conflicts in cases of emancipation, military schools or voluntarily in the
CRC and CRC Optional Protocol. Holding accountable for serious violations of human rights for
persons in this age group reinforce the reintegration, demobilization, disbarment, rehabilitation,
and reconciliation of child soldiers into the society for normal and constructive civil life.
This can be realized by introducing a sort of criminal accountability suitable for these categories
of persons like restorative justice, TRC and others in the normal theories of criminal
punishments. The punitive criminal punishments can harm children in these age groups but it is
possible to introduce what I call restorative responsibility in order to fight against impunity and
bring about sustainable justice and social cohesion for lasting peace.
Incidentally however, the issue of child soldiers and its implications are also seen in birds eye
view manner in Ethiopia though not part to the ICC Rome Statute to see other grounds where theICC can embark upon Ethiopia through the UNSC referral, ratifying State referral and other
means.
Key Words: ICC Rome Statute, ICC, War Crimes, Jurisdictional limitation, Child Soldiers,
Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility, Human Rights Protection, Impunity, justice, UNSC
referral and Ethiopia
Description
Keywords
ICC Rome Statute, ICC, War Crimes, Jurisdictional limitation, Child Soldiers, Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility, Human Rights Protection, Impunity, justice, UNSC referral and Ethiopia.