Resource Related Conflicts in Metekel Zone of Benishangul-Gumuz Region, Ethiopia
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024-08
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Addis Ababa University
Abstract
The nexus of natural resource and conflict has always been at the heart of peace and security
studies, which concomitantly the foremost interpretations have relied heavily on the political,
socio-economic and cultural contexts. The persistent resource-related conflicts in several
developing countries thus rung once again for a renewed understanding of the contexts in which
the underlying causes and recurring patterns have all ingrained in for the past few decades.
Immersed on the land, water, and forest resource-related discordant between the Gumuz and the
non-Gumuz communities (among others these include the Amhara, Oromo and Agew ethnic
groups), this study was intended to delve into the contexts, trends and drivers of resource
conflicts, particularly in the Metekel Zone of the Benishangul-Gumuz Region. The specific
objectives were set to analyse the change and continuities in conflict trends and the key drivers
of natural resource disputes and ethnic tensions; examining the socio-psychological positions of
parties in conflict; identifying the key actors and relationships that has been shaping conflict
dynamics and impacts; and evaluating existing formal and informal institutions involved in the
early warning, prevention, and mitigation of such conflicts.
A qualitative research methodology was employed to collect and analyse data. The leading data
acquisition instruments include key informant interviews, expert interviews, focus group
discussions, archival evidences, reliable documents and other data sources. The findings
unveiled that a complex web of tensions have been rumbling the inhabitants of Metekel , and this
was essentially driven by stiff competition over scarce natural resources, faulty strategies
resorted to address historical grievances and elite-driven conflict-ridden regional politics. The
actors involved in these conflicts range from grassroots community members to influential
regional entities, each them has motivated by diverse interests such as resource acquisition,
excessive lust for power, and shaky inter-ethnic alliance and counter alliance. Mutually opposing
claims over land, group insecurity and the politics of difference in tandem with extensive
misinformation and hateful rhetorics have all pivoted for the recurring violent interethnic
confrontations. The study also uncovers that legal pluralism is in the making. Both the local
institutions that customarily used to address the intra-ethnic conflicts and the state-run
institutions which typically set to manage inter-ethnic disputes, often resorted to address the
intra and inter-ethnic conflicts. Nonetheless, the local institutions of conflict resolution have not
yet fully realized their potentials in both transforming the on-going challenges and nurturing
durable peace.
Description
Keywords
resource conflict, conflict actors, ethnic tension and peacebuilding