Comparing Hemodynamic Response to Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Versus Endotracheal Tube Intubation in Surgical Patients A Prospective cohort Study, Addis Ababa Ethiopia

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorBiruk Tesfaye
dc.contributor.authorEyerusalem Sisay
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-25T07:18:50Z
dc.date.available2025-08-25T07:18:50Z
dc.date.issued2025-06
dc.description.abstractEffective airway management is essential in anesthesia, with endotracheal intubation (ETI) widely regarded as the standard technique. However, ETI is associated with significant hemodynamic responses due to sympathetic stimulation during laryngoscopy, which may pose risks, particularly in patients with cardiovascular compromise. Laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) offer a less invasive alternative and are increasingly used in clinical practice. Despite their growing adoption, limited evidence exists comparing the hemodynamic effects of LMA insertion versus ETI in surgical patients
dc.identifier.urihttps://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/7130
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAddis Ababa University
dc.subjectHemodynamic parameters
dc.subjectlaryngeal mask airway
dc.subjectendotracheal tube
dc.titleComparing Hemodynamic Response to Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Versus Endotracheal Tube Intubation in Surgical Patients A Prospective cohort Study, Addis Ababa Ethiopia
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Eyerusalem Sisay.pdf
Size:
1.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Anaesthesia and Anaesthesiology