Capacity Building for Decentralized Local Governance: The Case of Adami Tulu Jido Woreda and Ziway Town in Oromia
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2007-08
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Addis Ababa University
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the peiformance of capacity building activities and examine the
implementing capacity of decentralized local governance. The study was conducted in Adami Tulu Jido
woreda and Ziway town. Comparative study with cross sectional survey was used in the study to compare
the two local governments. Descriptive survey method of analysis was also employed to achieve the
objectives of the study. The subjects of the study were civil servants and cabinet members of the two local
governments. Questionnaires were used to collect data from the civil servants and cabinet members. In
addition focus group discussions and interviews were also conducted with about 24 individuals. Data
were analyzed through quantitative and qualitative methods. The statistical method used to analyze the
quantitative data was percentage.
The results reveal that even though the local governments have been given a wide range of responsibilities
and powers in terms of planning and prioritizing their local needs, their implementing capacity is very
weak. Human resource in both local governments both in quantity and quality is found to be deficient to
shoulder different local level responsibilities. Women are also under represented in the civil service and
in the cabinet members. Shortage of budget and skilled human resource, and high turnover of officials and
key experts due to frequent reorganization and restructuring of offices, transfer, demotion and promotion
are critical problems observed in both local governments. In addition, different facilities and core
resources are not adequately available in the sectors of both woreda and town. As a result the status of
human resource, organizational and institutional capacity is found to be weak.
The capacity building/training activities conducted in the areas were not need-based. Besides, training
impact assessment was not undertaken. Weak management capacity, unfavorable enabling environment
and absence of adequate facilities and resources characterize both local governments. Community
participation is also limited to implementation of planned projects than at planning and decision making
levels.
It was generally recommended that continuous training of employees and officials; conducting
training need and impact analysis; designing reward system, support in fulfilling the resources
and facilities on the part of the regional government, participation of local community in need
prioritization, planning and decision making, making available different policy documents,
guidelines, and rules for employees; creating stable and suitable structure and in general
building local capacity be undertaken.
Description
Keywords
Decentralized Local Governance