Evaluation Of EGM2008 by Means Of GPS/Levelling In Uganda

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2013-04

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Addis Ababa University

Abstract

The global gravity model EGM2008 is evaluated in various regions of the country to assess if it is good enough for geodetic applications. The evaluation method involves comparison of geoid heights computed from the model with those computed at irregularly distributed GPS/levelling stations. For testing the model, a total of seven levelled benchmarks available in Uganda which belong to the New Khartoum datum are used. The spatial positions of these benchmarks were determined at mm accuracy, with respect to ITRF2008. The agreement between the EGM2008 geoid and the geoid undulation derived from GPS/levelling over the seven irregularly distributed benchmark points has a standard deviation of 0.255m, with a mean of -0.859m. The datum offset may be due the choice of Wo (potential of the geoid) and Uo (potential on the surface of the ellipsoid); using GRS80 for the gravitational reference system and WGS84 for the geometrical reference system; some possibly different tidal conventions; but, by using the same method of analysis for Ethiopia and Uganda, these absolute offset effects are eliminated when comparing the two so that the computed difference [0.118 m] in datum offset for the two states does tell us something about the differences in levelling datums. The standard deviation of 26 cm suggests that sparser, irregularly-distributed and inhomogenous gravity data for Uganda was used in the development of EGM2008 not ruling out errors in levelling since there is barely any documentation pertaining the accuracy of results obtained regarding the levelling network in Uganda.

Description

Keywords

EGM2008, GPS/Levelling In Uganda

Citation