Effects of Traditional Family Arbitration and Legal Divorce on Divorcees and Their Children: The Case of Boloso Sore Wereda, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2015-06

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Addis Ababa University

Abstract

This study has made an effort to investigate the effects of traditional family arbitration and legal divorce on divorcees and their children. For its methodological convenience qualitative method and non-probability purposive sampling techniques have been employed. Study participants have been divorcees, their children and reconciled spouses after opening of file for divorce in the court. The last five years (2010-2014) petition provided for divorce, divorced and reconciled spouses data has been used as point of observation. In addition to in-depth interview FGD, key informants’ interview and document analysis was done. Principal causes, prevalence, and effects of divorce, legal grounds of family arbitration, appointment and removal of arbitrators, composition and roles of arbitrators have been critically addressed to identify effects of traditional family arbitration. Moreover, fundamental reason of the court when redirecting the case of spouses for arbitration has been assessed to know the advantages of traditional family arbitration for divorcees and their children. Divorce is negatively affecting the social, economic and psychological status of divorcees and their children. Traditional family arbitration is believed to be the most effective and efficient conflict resolution mechanism among spouses. Principal effects of arbitration on disputing spouses and their children are protecting unstable families from disintegration, children separating from their parents, protects likely social evils related to divorce, reduces resource and time wastage of both litigating spouses and the court and shares court case overload. Potential challenges of arbitration are community’s lack of understanding about gender equality, rights and interests of women, marginalizing women from arbitration process, biased belief of women as if arbitration always favoring for men in their expense, and passing decisions in favor of men in the case common property management and parenting styles. Key words: Traditional family arbitration, court litigation and legal divorce

Description

Keywords

Traditional Family Arbitration; Court Litigation and Legal Divorce

Citation

Collections