The Scope of Tolerance and Political Pluralism under the Fdre Constitution: The Law and the Practice
| dc.contributor.advisor | Degefa, Abera (PhD) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Regassa, Birehanu | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-26T07:47:02Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-08T11:43:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-09-26T07:47:02Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-08T11:43:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The FDRE government consistently denied human right violation allegation raised by many international human rights advocacy groups. For instance; Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, CPJ, Freedom House and the like, and also many legal and political scholars and practitioners were blamed it for its alleged human right violations that intentionally committed on individuals and groups who have dissent political views. But recently, the FDRE government, which is led by the group that is born from the ruling party itself and who climes itself as a “reformist”, was acknowledged all such alleged human rights violations committed by the government and shown its commitment to make a major reforms that possibly avoids government‟s acts of human right violations. Furthermore, the FDRE government (which is led by the group who describe itself as reformist group) officially acknowledged the fact how individuals and groups were exposed for human rights violation for the mare reason that they were attempted to enjoy their naturally endowed rights and freedom, and how such acts of human right violations were contributed for the narrowed political space created in the country, and how such situation needs a substantive reform. Despite such a good start and political willingness shown from the FDRE government side , it is still important to enquire why the FDRE government was intolerant of political dissent and also failed to establish a vibrant pluralistic political system in the country, in view of the fact that there is a constitution that acknowledges and stipulates, in a fairly detailed manner, bill of rights and claims to create a one political polity which is embraced with democratic order (something unthinkable to achieve without promoting and enhancing political pluralism). Hence, this study is intended to enquire and identify the reason why the FDRE government was intolerant of political dissent and also failed to establish vibrant pluralistic political system in the country, in view of the fact that there is a constitution that acknowledges and stipulates, in a fairly detailed manner, bill of rights and intends to create a one political polity that entertain democratic order. Key words; Tolerance, Political Tolerance, Political Pluralism, and Revolutionary Democracy | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/19175 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Addis Ababa University | en_US |
| dc.subject | Tolerance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Political Tolerance | en_US |
| dc.subject | Political Pluralism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Revolutionary Democracy | en_US |
| dc.title | The Scope of Tolerance and Political Pluralism under the Fdre Constitution: The Law and the Practice | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |