Application of Data Mining Techniques for Conceptual Cost Estimation of Selected Building Projects in Addis Ababa

dc.contributor.advisorbraham, Assefa (PhD)
dc.contributor.authorBiruk, Lemlem
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T04:32:12Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-11T08:29:39Z
dc.date.available2022-06-08T04:32:12Z
dc.date.available2023-11-11T08:29:39Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.description.abstractFor project managers and decision makers, developing an accurate cost estimate in the conceptual stage of a project is a crucial but challenging task. Different techniques and methods have been devised and researched to accurately estimate the cost of building projects at the preliminary stages. These methods can broadly be divided into two based on the approach they follow. The cost –based or parametric cost modeling approach uses historical cost data and different Data Mining techniques to develop a cost prediction model. The second method uses a bottom-up or quantity strategy, in which data on the quantity of works is utilized to construct quantity prediction models for each work item. These predicted quantities can then be multiplied by their current unit rates to determine the respective costs. In this study a parametric cost model is first developed to assess its accuracy in predicting the final cost of building projects based on historical data collected from selected building projects in Addis Ababa. This was then followed by doing a comparison between the cost based and quantity based approaches by developing models for structural cost prediction as well as quantity models for the different work items that make up the structural work (concrete, reinforcement, and formwork). Concurrently, the study explored the effectiveness of four data mining techniques, namely Linear Regression (LR), Decision Trees (DT), Neural Networks (ANN), and Gradient Boosted Trees (GBT) in estimating the final and structural cost of building projects. With a relative error of 37.05%, the ANN model was the most accurate in forecasting the final cost of a construction project, while the GBT model performed better in predicting structural costs with a relative error of 22.67%. For quantity estimation models, the NN model showed superior performance for concrete and reinforcement quantity estimation with a relative errors of 16.44% and 19.32% respectively. The GBT model on the other hand performed better in formwork quantity estimation with a relative error of 19.58%. Accordingly, the total slab area was identified to be the most important variable for all prediction. The study indicated the quantity based approach provides more accurate cost prediction as opposed to the cost based approach for the case of structural cost estimation.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/12345678/31946
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAddis Ababa Universityen_US
dc.subjectData miningen_US
dc.subjectConceptual Cost Estimationen_US
dc.subjectStructural Cost Estimationen_US
dc.subjectQuantity Estimationen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Neural Networken_US
dc.subjectGradient Boosted Treesen_US
dc.subjectLinear Regressionen_US
dc.subjectDecision Treesen_US
dc.titleApplication of Data Mining Techniques for Conceptual Cost Estimation of Selected Building Projects in Addis Ababaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Biruk Lemlem.pdf
Size:
5.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: