Indigenous Institutions of Conflict Resolution among the All'ala Afar of North-Eastern Ethiopia
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2000-05
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
AAU
Abstract
This is a study on indigenous practices of conflict resolution among the Afar who share a common
boundary with Tigrayan highlanders in northem Ethiopia. The latter constitute a separate ethnic
group and have a slightly ditferent lII eans of subsistence. The aim of tile study was to examine tJle
types of disputes in historical perspectives and understand local ways of handling conflict ranging
from the intra-clan to the inter-ethllic level.
The study revealed that the nature of conflict changed with changes in the ecological, socio economic and political arena . Ecological disasters causing huge livestock loss have forced the
Afar to diversify their means or incolll e to cope up with the situation. This shih in tile Ineans of
livelihood had its own effects as far as the traditional institutions and value systems are concerned.
With a shift fi'om nomadic based economy to cultivation, the pastoral attitude of cOllllllullal
ownership of land altered and conllicts taking the fOl1n of land disputes and water diversion rights
became rampant. Urballisation alld wage labour lIIigration had also weakened kinship obligations
and clan solidarity alllollg the !d~lr which bear th eir own influence on local disput e settl ement.
On the highl and-Iowlalld dilll ension, past experiences reveal that raids triggered by resource
competition, loss of stock and the quest for social honour had been COllllllon . Currently, however,
sedentarisation reduced mobility of the Afar and minimised the extent of inter-etIlJlie cOllflict. In
lct , this together witJI existing cross-cutting ties, economic and social relations with highlanders
strengthened peace in the northern PClltS of the ethnic boundary. III sOllie cases, fights that OCClll'
uetwecn illdividuals or slliall groups cspecially in thc southem territory ollcn quickly turn into
inter-etlUlic conflict expressed in replisals. But dissolution of the traditional political systelll of the
soutJlern highlanders has made it difficult for them to pursue their institutional violence against tJle
Afar. Besides, the cUIl'ent Federa1 systelJl of govemment has generally enabled the Ajar to see
themselves as a group giving little imp0l1ance to clan differences. Thjs along with the Afar
people's increased involvement ill lIational affairs created power balallce between them aJld the
Tigrayan highlanders leading to a reduction in tJle prevalence of raids.
When conflicts occur at various levels, tlle AJar generally rely more 011 their own local dispute
settlement forums than the government legal machinery. Within their OWII group, clan elders as
well as kjnship and clomestic groups maintain peace through sanctiolls following mablo
assemblies. Relations with the hi ghlanders are also regulated via a jointly established institution
called (Jereb, which eJlforces order based on written customary laws. At present, govemlllent
illstitutions also co-operate with local inter-ethnic mediation at diOerellt stages.