Studies on Virologic, Immunologic and Other Host Factors Contributing to Resistance to HIV Infection in Discordant and Concordant Couples in Ethiopia.
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2011-03
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Addis Ababa University
Abstract
It was not known why some people were HIV negative and others were HIV positive despite frequent sexual
relationship between couples in Ethiopia. Most of the transmission of HIV is currently between discordant
couples. This is a big problem as very few people know their HIV status and protection between couples
during sexual intercourse is unknown. The result obtained from the study of discordant couples is very
important as it enables us to know the reasons for susceptibility and resistance to HIV infection. This is
especially true for policy makers as the result obtained from this study is high quality data including
behavioral, biomedical and virological factors.
The objectives of this study is, therefore, to investigate the reasons for susceptibility and resistance to HIV
infection in discordant couples, which may involve behavioral, viral, immunological and other host and viral
factors by comparing with concordant and healthy negative control subjects.
The study involves discordant couples who have been in marriage relationship for more than one year,
concordant couples and healthy negative couples with similar marital status with discordant couples. The
study was carried out in hospitals and clinics all over Ethiopia and involved discordant and concordant
couples who were on the follow up for many years in the respective hospital and clinics and were not on
antiretroviral treatment. The samples were analyzed with appropriate statistical package using SPSS version
13 soft ware.
To study if the difference in sexual behavior might have contributed to their serodiscordance, 325 discordant
couples, 152 concordant couples and 14 healthy negative controls sexual behavior was studied. The study
method involved an in-depth interview. There were known behavioral differences between discordant
negatives and positives and concordant couples. There was very close similarity in behavior
between discordant positives and concordant couples, showing that they shared similar risk
behaviors. But the difference between discordant negatives and discordant positives was clear and
big enough showing distant behavioral similarities. The healthy controls were behaviorally very
much different from both discordant and concordant couples but they were similar to discordant
negatives in some of their behaviors.
Almost all of them were not aware of HIV before VCT and had multiple partners before marriage
and were multiply married. All had unprotected sexual intercourse before and after marriage with
their partners and there was no HIV test in between marriages. The majority of them were,
however, satisfied in their marriages, but the reason for the satisfaction was not based on love,
faithfulness and mutual respect. The reason for the dissatisfaction was also similar. The sexual
frequency and number of sexual act per each contact was higher for discordant positives and
concordant couple than discordant negatives and healthy control and discordant positives and
concordant couples were also involved more in traumatic sex than discordant negatives. History of
STDs was also higher for discordant positives and concordant couples when compared with
xiii
discordant negatives. Discordant positives and concordant couples were exposed to more risky
behavior than concordant couples. Perceived mechanisms of HIV infection was also known risk
factors for HIV infection and were associated with their sexual lives, family, occupation, social
evils and injustice.
When subjects were compared immunologically, discordant negative partners had adequate amount
of CD4 equivalent to healthy subjects and highly significantly (P<.001) different from discordant
positives. CD4 and CD8 ratio was also high indicating a healthy balance and this was also similar to
healthy controls. Discordant positive partners had a significantly (P<.05) different number of CD4
cells when compared to concordant couples.
Their CD8 number was very similar to discordant negatives and there was no significant difference.
Increased CD8 number was associated with decreased viral load and in some subjects even to the
level of below detection level. Lower viral load in discordant positives when compared to
concordant couples also indicated lower or absence of transmission to uninfected partner. CD8 T
cells were responsible in decreasing viral load. The evidence for this came from the observation that
concordant couples showed elevated viral load and decreased CD8 T cells number while discordant
positives showed elevated CD8 and very low viral load. Their CD4 number was also closer but
slightly higher than the normal boundary count and might have been capable of providing the
appropriate help for CD8 cells.
Syphilis was a known risk factor for HIV transmission as it was diagnosed in many of discordant
positives and concordant couples. This is possible because syphilis is a common STD in this
country and its chronic nature might have accounted for its co-factor effect.
Analysis of T cell subpopulations in discordant couples showed no activation of a specific marker
between discordant positives and negatives and the expression of T cell subpopulations was
comparable. The only difference observed was the expression of activation markers in
significantltiy (P<.05) higher proportion in concordant couples when compared with discordant
positives , indicating lower immune activation in discordant positives. In discordant positives, in
addition to decreased number of activation markers there were also expression of certain markers
(CD4+CD45RA-CD27-) in higher proportion(>30%), which were common in long-term-non-
progressors, showing that discordant positives were long-term-non-progressors.
Our study showed that there was a clear difference between discordant positives and discordant
negative couples in their genetic profiles. There was also a clear difference between discordant
positives and concordant couples and AIDS patients, in their genetic profiles. Ethiopian AIDS
patients were different from Ethiopian concordant couples in their very significant to significant
association with HLA-A*29, *18, and *41; HLA-B*0705, *1517, *4101, *5001, *7301 and *18;
xiv
HLA-C*0501, *0701, and *0740. AIDS patients were also very significantly different from
discordant positives in their associations HLA-A*68, HLA-B*39 and HLA- DR*11. AIDS patient
were also different from discordant negatives in their very highly significant to highly significant
association with HLA-*0801, *1817, *352001 and *4901; HLA-C*7 and HLA-DR*40301.
Concordant couples were also different from discordant positives in their very highly significant to
significant associations with HLA-B* 0705, *0801 and *3910. Concordant couples were also
different from discordant negatives in their significant association with HLA-DR*100101 and
*110201. Discordant negatives were different from discordant positives in expressing HLA profiles
of HLA-B*0801, *39, *41, *39; HLA-C*0716, HLA-DR*100101 and *110201. Overall, the
differences between the different groups had a genetic background.
When comparisons were made between discordant positives, concordant couples and AIDS
subjects, discordant positive subjects were found to be more heterozygous at all loci (HLA-A, B, C
and HLA-DR) when compared with concordant couples and HIV/AIDS subjects. This showed that
discordant positives better controlled HIV and maintained HIV in check and were non- progressors
due to heterozygous advantage. Overall, the results for discordant positives and AIDS subjects were
clear enough to show significant difference between them.
Ethiopian HIV viruses were mainly HIV type C in all discordant positives and HIV/AIDS subjects.
But other subtypes such as subtype A, B and recombinant A/G subtypes were also observed. Co
receptor utilization of discordant positive isolated viruses was both CCR5 and CXCR4 in equal
proportion. The majority of HIV/AIDS patients used CXCR4, although about one third used CCR5
and a few also used dual co receptors. Our study showed that the majority of subtype C viruses
were CXCR4/SI high/rapid subtype. And about one third was CCR5/NSI subtypes. The
phylogenetic or evolutionary relationship showed that the majority of the viruses isolated from
discordant positives showed subclustering in one region and those isolated from concordant couples
in another region, showing that discordant positive isolated viruses were evolving independently
and were related with each other but this was not seen in viruses of concordant couples and
HIV/AIDS subjects.
Description
Keywords
HIV/AIDS, HIV negative