Browsing by Author "Sileshi, Biruk"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Screening food lesl pa.ramelers 10 deice I adulleration of leff (Eragroslis leI (Zucc.) Troller) flour and injera with non-edible adulteranls(Addis Ababa University, 2017-06) Sileshi, Biruk; Geillch ew PhD, PaulosTeff(Eragrostis fe/ (Zuee .) Troner) is the main staple cereal in Ethiopia that is used to prepare a fermented flatbread with a unique slightly spongy texture named injera. Majority of Ethiopian diets consist of injera which accounts for about two--th irds of the daily protein intake of the Ethiopian population. Recently, adulterat ion ofteffflour and injcra with non·cdible ingredients is becoming a serious problem puning the consumers' health at risk. Therefore, the main purpose of th is study is to screen some of the common food analyses test parameters that could detect nonedible adu lterants in lef[ flour and injera for potent ial use in future routi ne inspection ana lysis. In the study, simulation of the adulteration was made on two widely distributed white teffvarieti es, namely Quncho TefT (DZ-Cr-387) and Magna TefT (DZ-O 1-196). Three adulterants were selected based on the information gathered from local health bureau, namely Sawdust (organic adulterant) and two inorganic adu lterants, chalk powder (calcium carbonate) and gypsum (calcium sulphate dihydrate). Based on the information gathered, the lefT to adulterant ratio was (7:3). Thus, the primary investigation was conducted on this adulteration ratio. Accordingly, the analyt ical tests at this adulteration ratio resulted in a significant mean value difference between the adulterated and control teff nour samples. Secondary investigation was done by preparing injera using lower ratio ofteff nour to adulterants (9.5:0.5), (9: I), (8.5: 1.5), (8:2) and (7.5:2.5), while unadu lterated (100%) teO' nour injera was used as control. Ratios resulting in acceptab le injcra appearance were used as cut-off adulteration ratios to apply the selected test parameters. The final investigation was conducted using the cut-off adulteration ratio, on which the selected test parameters were applied to compare significant mean differences (p < 0.05) between control and adulterated tefTnour and injera samples. The overall results of the physicochemical analysis showed that some parameters like crude ash, and crude fib re, and mineral analysis of calcium could be used as detection test parameters for samples as low as 5% adulteration ratio. Qualitative tests such as effervescence and precipitation are also effective tests to detect adulteration. Therefore, this study provides test parameters for preliminary teIT flour and injera adulteration detection, which can further be developed by concerned bodies to come up with standard analytical procedu res for the detection leff and te IT injera with the tested and other simi lar adu lterants.Item Screening Food Test Parameters to Detect Adulteration of Teff (Eragrostis Tef (Zucc.) Trotter) Flour and Injera with Non-Edible Adulterants(Addis Ababa University, 2018-06-06) Sileshi, Biruk; Getachew, Paulos (PhD)Teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) is the main staple cereal in Ethiopia that is used to prepare a fermented flatbread with a unique slightly spongy texture named injera. Majority of Ethiopian diets consist of injera which accounts for about two-thirds of the daily protein intake of the Ethiopian population. Recently, adulteration of teff flour and injera with non-edible ingredients is becoming a serious problem putting the consumers’ health at risk. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to screen some of the common food analyses test parameters that could detect nonedible adulterants in teff flour and injera for potential use in future routine inspection analysis. In the study, simulation of the adulteration was made on two widely distributed white teff varieties, namely Quncho Teff (DZ-Cr-387) and Magna Teff (DZ-01-196). Three adulterants were selected based on the information gathered from local health bureau, namely Sawdust (organic adulterant) and two inorganic adulterants, chalk powder (calcium carbonate) and gypsum (calcium sulphate dihydrate). Based on the information gathered, the teff to adulterant ratio was (7:3). Thus, the primary investigation was conducted on this adulteration ratio. Accordingly, the analytical tests at this adulteration ratio resulted in a significant mean value difference between the adulterated and control teff flour samples. Secondary investigation was done by preparing injera using lower ratio of teff flour to adulterants (9.5:0.5), (9:1), (8.5:1.5), (8:2) and (7.5:2.5), while unadulterated (100%) teff flour injera was used as control. Ratios resulting in acceptable injera appearance were used as cut-off adulteration ratios to apply the selected test parameters. The final investigation was conducted using the cut-off adulteration ratio, on which the selected test parameters were applied to compare significant mean differences (p < 0.05) between control and adulterated teff flour and injera samples. The overall results of the physicochemical analysis showed that some parameters like crude ash, and crude fibre, and mineral analysis of calcium could be used as detection test parameters for samples as low as 5% adulteration ratio. Qualitative tests such as effervescence and precipitation are also effective tests to detect adulteration. Therefore, this study provides test parameters for preliminary teff flour and injera adulteration detection, which can further be developed by concerned bodies to come up with standard analytical procedures for the detection teff and teff injera with the tested and other similar adulterants.