Browsing by Author "Mohammed Dejen(PhD)"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Assessment of Factors Affecting Interregional Conflict Resolution in federal Ethiopia: The Case of Oromia and Somali regions
    (Addis Ababa University, 2018-06) Gezu Geremew; Mohammed Dejen(PhD)
    The Ethiopian government designed a constitution that have a democratic and human rights that guaranteed for the citizen after the fall of Derg regime . All peoples of Ethiopia have a protection as national and regional in both international convention and Domestic laws within the country. This study was designed to assess the factors affecting interregional Conflict Resolution in Oromia and Somali regions of Ethiopia. In order to address the research objective, this study employed both the descriptive and explanatory research design. Moreover, both qualitative and quantitative research approaches were employed since mixed methods helps to make use of different data source. Data were collected from primary and secondary sources through questionnaires, interviews, document review, FGD and observation. The researcher used both probability and non probability sampling techniques to draw the sample. In total, 50 high experts,15 elders,10 leaders 10 persons from different societies were selected randomly and 25 key informants were purposefully selected. Finally, the raw data collected through the survey were analyzed based on qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques involving descriptive and SPSS analysis. From this analysis to bring sustainable peace within the two regions were the major problems within the stake holders. The study also found that differentiate the root cause and trigger or immediate cause of the two regions , unclear demarcation of territorial arrangement as a referendum and the miss use of legal binding actors are another problems. So, in order to accommodate the two regions people beneficial differentiations better to have solve demarcation of territorial boundaries problems and mediate genuinely and justice .
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Self-Rule and Representation in Amhara National Regional State: a Case Study on Argoba Nationality
    (Addis Ababa University, 2016-06) Mohammed Mebrat; Mohammed Dejen(PhD)
    Nowadays, federalism has been used as a means for the accommodation of diversity of different groups with varied interests by minimizing the possibility of the domination of minority groups by the majority across the world. Ethiopia, in order to manage the diverse interests of its ethnic groups and rectify historical injustices, adopted a federal system de facto in 1991 and de jure in 1995. As one pillar of federalism, self-rule and shared-rule has to be managed fairly for the benefit of all ethnic groups. Self-rule and representation at the center becomes even more crucial in a divided society like Ethiopia. The Ethiopian federal system, though the national constitution invests a lot for the protection of self-rule and representation rights of minority groups, exhibits a gap in fully implementing these rights at the local level. This is mainly due to the legal lacunae and other practical problems manifested in the form of interference from higher officials and the incumbent political party. The Argoba Nationality in South Wollo Zone of the Amhara National Regional State, as a minority nationality group, has less benefited from the federal state arrangement as enshrined in the constitution due to factors related to the above mentioned problems. This study is mainly conducted to examine the practical implementation of the self-rule and representation rights of Argoba Nationality in the Ethiopian federation. By doing so, it addressed two basic questions – how the full measure of self-rule and representation rights of minority groups (taking the Argoba nationality wereda as a case study) is achieved and secured? What factors prohibited and/or contributed the Nationality wereda from practicing these rights? To achieve this purpose, the study has employed qualitative research approach. Both primary and secondary data sources have been consulted. The study found that, the protection of Argoba nationality as a minority and local government is performed through mere recognition of existence. The recognition is not accompanied by other minority ethnic group rights such as a fully-fledged self-rule and representation rights at the center. For the recognition to be practical and meaningful, it is better for the regional state to allow the Argoba Nationality to exercise their self-rule right at the local level and have their fair share at the center by minimizing top-down interference.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Vertical Intergovernmental Relations and Peace-Building in Ethiopian Federation; A Case Study of the Federal Ministry of Peace and Addis Ababa City Administration Peace and Security Bureau.
    (Addis Ababa University, 2024-06) Mikias Tadesse; Mohammed Dejen(PhD)
    This study explores the interplay between formal and informal intergovernmental relations (IGRs) between the Ministry of Peace (MOP), the Addis Ababa City Administration Peace and Security Bureau (AAPSB), and the Sheger City Security Administration Office in their contributions to peace-building initiatives in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The research, employing a qualitative case study approach with interviews and document analysis, reveals a complex landscape. While a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) exists between MOP and AAPSB, informal communication and reliance on personal connections significantly influence collaboration. The absence of a formal IGR structure, including dedicated forums and offices, coupled with a limited legal framework for fiscal arrangements and a lack of awareness of IGR mechanisms, act as significant hurdles to effective collaboration. The study identifies both institutional and political factors impacting IGRs. Institutionally, the lack of skilled personnel trained in IGR practices and the absence of a dedicated body like a National IGR Secretariat hinder progress. Additionally, the current IGR proclamation lacks detailed implementing regulations and directives. Financial constraints further impede efforts towards joint planning and awareness creation. Politically, factors like party affiliation, overreliance on informal party channels, and a lack of commitment from leaders pose challenges. Despite these limitations, informal IGRs have demonstrably contributed to successful conflict management and improved peace in Addis Ababa. The presence of the MOU signifies progress in cooperation. However, to ensure sustained and effective collaboration for future peace-building efforts, the research recommends strengthening institutional frameworks, establishing dedicated IGR forums and a National IGR Secretariat, enhancing capacity building, and improving the legal framework for IGRs. By implementing these recommendations, IGRs can evolve into a more robust and impactful tool for peace-building in Addis Ababa.