Comparative Study of Quality Assurance Practices in Public and Private Universities in Addis Ababa
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024-08
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Addis Ababa University
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the QA practices implemented in public and private HEIs, while also investigating the challenges associated with these practices. By examining the differences and similarities between these sectors, the study seeks to highlight strengths and weaknesses, ultimately contributing to the enhancement of quality assurance frameworks. The study was limited to seven public and private universities recognized by the ETA and MoE, located within the Addis Ababa Administrative Region. This study used a mixed research design primarily based on the quantitative data obtained through questionnaire but for triangulation, qualitative data were incorporated through interview and analysis of documents. The findings indicated that private HEIs possess clearer QA structures and more effective communication, aligning with institutional goals, while public HEIs often lack comprehensive QA frameworks at lower levels. Both sectors face challenges with QA report accessibility, but private HEIs conduct self-evaluations more regularly and involve employers, teachers, and students more effectively in program reviews. Public HEIs experience significant financial constraints, a lack of genuine commitment from top management to QA, and inconsistent government policies. Additionally, inadequate QA training is more pressing in public HEIs, and time constraints are a greater issue for private institutions. Public HEIs also tend to prioritize process over substance and experience greater political pressure. Conversely, private HEIs rely more heavily on external validation. The study recommends that public institutions should develop comprehensive QA frameworks and enhance QA practices. The ETA should strengthen its role in monitoring quality education, while both sectors should encourage greater employer involvement and establish alumni associations. Public HEIs should seek increased government funding and prioritize strong top management commitment to QA.
Key terms: Higher Education Institutions, Quality Assurance, Quality Assurance Practice, Quality Assurance Framework, Descriptive studies.
Description
Keywords
Higher Education Institutions, Quality Assurance, Quality Assurance Practice, Quality Assurance Framework, Descriptive studies.