Learners' Perception of Their Interlanguage of Engljsh as A F'oreign Language Second Year Co Llege Afaan Oromoo Speakers in Focus
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2007-03
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Addis Ababa University
Abstract
English teachers in most Oromia colleges often level complaints at their students for being unable
to write sensible sentences in composition which they downgrade as error-jilled, Ll -driven,
fragmentary, illegible, inexpressive, frustrating and fossilized. In order to minimize Ll-FL
incompatibilities or narrow down such ever-widening deviation from the intended standard,
therefore, overruling causes of the learners' inexpressive ability will have to be explained from
their perception and error analysis of their grammar, word power, orthography and cohesion.
The very objective of the study is therefore, to discover learner-perceived (I) current ability of
English in written composition, (2) the overriding causes and (3) some working solutions of second
year Asella Teacher Education College Oromoo students ' deviant EFL expressivity from the
standard English norm thence. To meet these objectives, multiple perspectives on learner, teacher,
and applied-linguistics bases of error analysis model of Corder (1981).
Data sources were (1) students ' spontaneous essays and (2) one questionnaire administered to both
students and teachers who additionally took part in the third tool (3) focus group discussion for
eliciting learner perception. Drawing on systematic random and purposive sampling techniques
painstakingly, the data of 72 English sample learners and their 143 spontaneously written essays
were processed to get base-line data to resolve the issue.
The broader goals of the study were largely met by basically using the memorable model involving
three condensed steps: identifYing errors, describing and explaining them. Indeed this has been
attuned to a mild mix of quantitative descriptive statistical measures like percentages, frequencies
and standard deviation and mean with perceivable simplicity. The qualitative procedures used for
interlanguage error data elicitation and analysis include: codifYing errors, classifYing, comparing,
tabulating and graphing, describing and interpreting.
Ultimately, three distinct findings evolved from the learners' tapped perception and analyzed
errors: (I) overall inadequacy of their current learning conditions of grammar in writing context
have been discovered, (2) LI Afaan Oromoo error influence and overgeneralized English rules are
the most predominant causal influences to their perception while learning-induced errors also
stood out influentially in their writings, (3) top prioritized solution being the imperative call for
preparing new learning materials. Hence employing multiple perspectives, and procedures, tools,
piloting, impact evaluation, detailing background, and inter-rater agreement may intentionally add
a degree of confidence or back reliability and validity. Conclusions and recommendations have
also been drawn to redirect issues in filture.
Description
Keywords
Interlanguage of English