Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Colleges, Institutes & Collections
  • Browse AAU-ETD
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Српски
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Mahlet Amare"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Social Support, Resilience and Psychological Distress, Among Refugees: The Case of Alemwach Refugee Camp in North Gonder, Ethiopia
    (Addis Ababa University, 2024-11) Mahlet Amare; Mitiku Hambisa (PhD)
    This study investigated the relationship between psychological distress, social support, and resilience among refugees in the Alemwach refugee camp in North Gondar, Ethiopia. Different literatures related with psychological distress, social support, and resilience was widely discussed in relation to the research objective. The research used quantitative research approach with descriptive and inferential data analysis using a quantitative research approach. A simple random sampling technique was used to select questionnaire respondents, while convenience sampling was applied for interviews. Data were collected using the Kessler K10 scale for psychological distress, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and the Multidimensional Cognitive Social Support Scale. Out of 384 distributed questionnaires, 369 were completed, resulting in a 96% response rate, with data analyzed using SPSS version 24. The findings revealed that 30.4% of refugees reported high social support, 40.5% reported moderate support, and 26.1% reported low support levels. In terms of resilience, 68.28% exhibited high resilience, 23.03% showed moderate resilience and 8.13% had low resilience. Regarding psychological distress, 2.4% experienced severe distress, 45% mild distress, 15.5% moderate distress, and 37.1% low distress. A significant negative correlation was found between psychological distress and social support (r = -0.342**, p = 0.00), indicating that higher social support is associated with lower psychological distress; conversely, psychological distress is positively correlated with resilience, while social support is also positively related to resilience. Gender and age differences were observed, with females and younger refugees experiencing higher psychological distress compared to males and older refugees who reported greater resilience and social support. The study recommends that enhancing social support networks and fostering resilience are essential for reducing psychological distress among refugees, recommending initiatives such as resilience training programs, hiring more mental health professionals, addressing gender-specific needs, promoting community-led initiatives, and improving collaboration among humanitarian organizations. Key words: psychological distress, Refugees, Resilience, social support
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Effect of Behavioral Factors on Corporate Investment Decisions: In Case of Selected Private Banks
    (Addis Ababa University, 2025-09) Mahlet Amare; Tesfa Nega (PhD)
    corporate investments. This study employed a quantitative research approach using a cross-sectional survey design to examine the influence of behavioral factors on corporate investment decisions in selected private banks. Data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to employees in corporate departments, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and multiple regression techniques with SPSS. Data collected from 100 respondents reveal varied levels of participation: 29% are currently involved in corporate investments, 49% plan to participate in the future, while 22% remain unaware of share investment opportunities. The findings highlight the significant influence of past price trends and recent asset performance on investment decisions, with 51% to 61% of respondents agreeing that these factors guide their forecasts and choices. Behavioral biases consistent with Prospect Theory emerge clearly. After experiencing losses, 39% of investors exhibit risk aversion, whereas 62% display increased risk-taking following gains. Mental accounting is prevalent, as 65% of respondents segregate their finances into distinct mental accounts, 82% assign specific purposes to these accounts, and 74% track them separately. However, only 11% disregard the connections between different accounts, indicating most investors recognize the interrelated nature of their finances. Social influences significantly affect decision-making: 55% of respondents report that other investors’ funding choices impact their own, and 58% consider close friends and relatives as trusted sources of investment advice. Investor preferences tend toward stability and risk management, with 43% favoring stable, low-risk investments, 35% opting for diversified portfolios, and 42% focusing on long-term growth strategies. Despite these preferences, investors face notable challenges impeding effective participation. Insufficient capital (51%), limited market knowledge (35%), fear of losses (22%), and time constraints (19%) are the primary barriers identified. These insights underscore the complex behavioral finance dynamics shaping investment behavior and highlight the need for tailored investor education, support systems, and behavioral

Home |Privacy policy |End User Agreement |Send Feedback |Library Website

Addis Ababa University © 2023