Adil Zekaria (PhD)Abel Negussie2024-04-302024-04-302024-04https://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/2895Axial loads highly affect the behavior of reinforced concrete members, such as failure mode, yield curvature, ultimate curvature, curvature ductility, beam-column joint, etc. In order to limit the adverse effects of axial loads, Ethiopian Standards based on Euro-Norms limits normalized design axial compressive loads. This research explores the basis for these limits and then compares them with other major codes and standards. The primary aim for these limits is for the axial loads not to exceed loads at balanced failure, . To study the balanced conditions, a series of interaction charts were constructed with the confinement effect of transverse reinforcement on concrete considered. The three main parameters for the charts are the distance of compression reinforcement from the extreme compression fibres normalised with respect to effective depth, ⁄ , mechanical reinforcement ratios, , and mechanical volumetric ratio of confining reinforcement, . Sectional properties, i.e., yield curvature, ultimate curvature and curvature ductility, under the obtained balanced axial loads were compared to their perspective limits. It was concluded that is highly affected by , and to a lesser extent by and . It has an inversely proportional relationship with both , and . Fifteen different column section was also considered as an example, and their results are in alignment with the interaction charts. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that the limits can be more directed for values of . This is especially the case for column sections having lower values of which show a greater load capacity than the set limits.en-USAxial Loads of Es-En 1998:2015Building CodesColumnsA Comparative Study of Limits on Normalized Axial Loads of Es-En 1998:2015 With Other Current Major Building Codes on ColumnsThesis